THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE NATO: THE VALIDITY OR VISIBILITY
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE NATO: THE VALIDITY OR VISIBILITY
Annotation
PII
S013038640000619-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
10-20
Abstract
2009 is the anniversary year for one of the most famous and influential military-political alliances - the North Atlantic Bloc. Over the 60 years of its existence, humanity has had many reasons to make sure that the declarations of the participating States, which declared in 1949 that they were joining their efforts "for collective defense, the preservation of peace and security", are true. The author has his own point of view on this matter. Owing to the recent official duties of the head existed in the Russian defense Ministry's Main Directorate for international military cooperation - I have had the opportunity to follow many processes occurring in the Alliance, to interact closely with colleagues from Germany, UK, USA, Greece and other NATO countries together with them to lay the Foundation of bilateral relations in the framework established in 1997-Russia Council NATO. Matching personal experience with knowledge of the history of NATO, the practice of its activities with the permanent representations of its founders on the transformation of the Alliance in "instrument of international security", many years, trying in vain to find any evidence.
Date of publication
06.01.2009
Number of purchasers
0
Views
1031
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
Additional services access
Additional services for the article
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Nezhinskij L.M., Chelyshev I.A. Problemy vneshnej politiki. -SSSR i kholodnaya vojna. M.,1995; 
2. Chubar'yan A.O. Novaya istoriya "kholodnoj vojny". -Novaya i novejshaya istoriya, 1997, № 6;
3. Zubok V.M., Pechatnov VO. Istoriografiya "kholodnoj vojny" v Rossii: nekotorye itogi desyatiletiya. -Otechestvennaya istoriya, 2003, № 4.
4. Kissindzher G. Yadernoe oruzhie i vneshnyaya politika. M., 1959, s. 239.
5. Spravochnik NATO (na russkom yazyke). Bryussel', 2006, s. 438.
6. Sistemnaya istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij. Pod red. A.D. Bogaturova, v 3-kh t. M., 2000, t. 3, s. 62.
7. Lider Yu. NATO. Ocherki istorii i doktriny. M., 1964, s. 79.
8. Tam zhe, s. 86.
9. IstyaginL.G. FRG i NATO. M., 1963, s. 31.
10. Shein VS. SShA i NATO: voenno-politicheskie problemy. M., 1984, s. 33.
11. Vorontsov G.A. Atlanticheskie otnosheniya i sovremennost'. M., 1977, s. 25;
12. Shein V.S. Ukaz. soch., s. 98.
13. Vorontsov G.A., Utkin A.I. Atlanticheskie soyuzniki: novye tendentsii v sopernichestve. M., 1983, s. 190-194.
14. Likhotal' A.A. Atlanticheskij al'yans: defitsit otvetstvennosti v usloviyakh yadernogo protivostoyaniya. M., 1987, s. 170.
15. Troitskij M.A. Transatlanticheskij soyuz. Modernizatsiya sistemy amerikano-evropejskogo partnerstva posle raspada bipolyarnosti. 1991-2004. M., 2004, s. 145, 165.
16. Ivashov L.G. NATO -instrument global'nogo vliyaniya. -Soyuznoe gosudarstvo, 2007, iyun'.
17. Ivashov L.G. Rossiya ili Moskoviya? Geopoliticheskoe izmerenie natsional'noj bezopasnosti Rossii. M., 2002, s. 253-254.
18. Ivashov L.G. Rossiya ili Moskoviya?, s. 255.
19. Troitskij M.A. Ukaz. soch., s. 156.
20. Ostankov V.I. Voennaya bezopasnost' Rossii v nachale XXI stoletiya. M., 2007, s. 226-231.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate